Showing posts with label Scott Dunn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scott Dunn. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Final Campaign Finance Report - Richardson Texas

The final campaign finance report is due Friday May 3rd, 2013.  I'd be curious to see what all the candidates have spent and received, especially the candidates that are running unopposed. 

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Cease the Discussion


If it wasn’t for the grassroots efforts and left to the city council, we wouldn’t be discussing the mayoral elections on May 11th, 2013.  If more people were paying attention, our city council wouldn’t be running unopposed.

 




Friday, April 12, 2013

Amir Omar On Election rather than Selection




This plea was made right before the city council of Richardson voted to cease the discussion of selection over election. 

 

See, Richardson Texas had this archaic way of picking their mayor, where, behind closed doors the 7 council members would pick one amongst themselves, a council member, to be mayor.  This was so that the powers that be (behind the curtain) would be able to pick the person that would be the face of Richardson.  If you look at the history of Richardson and go around the city, you can pretty much tell who was a mayor by the number of buildings they have named after themselves.

 

Any way… Amir Omar was the only one on this council to vote for changing the city charter and allow the citizens a vote for our mayor.  It took a lot of character to stand his ground…. Voted down 6 to 1…. Maybe that’s why he won ‘One Man Dallas’…. Whatever you try to label him…. He is all American and his character is all that should matter to folks.

 

 

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Dallas Mayoral Elections

Scott Dunn - Richardson Texas City Council Member


Will they be Educated Enough



Laura Maczka was voted in because the citizens thought that her position was the mayor position and only because it was Mayor Slagel's old position.

The citizens of Richardson need to wake up.  They do not need to be educated.  We have the government we have because there are only 5% of the people voting.  If a candidate receives 51% of 5%, is that a legitimate win??  The charter should require the election has a 30% or more turn out or it needs to be done over with more media coverage.